All episodes
#1
May 30, 202625 min

The 2026 Bonus Depreciation Cliff: Buy Now or Miss the Window?

With bonus depreciation at 20% in 2026 and zeroing out in 2027, Alex and Diana debate whether developers should sprint to close deals before year-end — or whether the urgency is overblown. The numbers are real. The disagreement is sharp.

Bonus DepreciationTCJA§168(k)Tax PlanningAcquisition Timing
A
Alex Mercer
D
Diana Cross, CPA, JD
Full Transcript

EPISODE 1 — May 30, 2026  ·  25 min

ALEX: Let's not waste time. We are sitting at 20% bonus depreciation in 2026 under §168(k), and in 2027 it drops to zero — unless Congress acts. Every developer with a deal in the pipeline who is dragging their feet on closing is leaving real money on the table. Diana, tell me I'm wrong.

DIANA: I'm not going to tell you you're wrong on the math. Twenty percent is better than zero. But I will push back hard on the panic-acquisition narrative, because this is how developers make poor capital decisions — they chase the tax tail instead of evaluating the deal on its fundamentals. If the asset isn't right at the right price, a 20% bonus depreciation election does not rescue the underwriting.

ALEX: I didn't say buy a bad deal. I said if you have a good deal in the pipeline, close it before December 31st. The difference in timing on a $10 million acquisition with $8 million in improvements — using a cost seg study that identifies 20% as 5-year property and 12% as 15-year land improvements — is real, measurable money. Walk me through why that urgency is overblown.

DIANA: Because the marginal benefit of the 2026 bonus election above baseline MACRS is narrower than most operators realize. For 5-year personal property, MACRS Year 1 under the double-declining balance with the half-year convention is already 20% of basis. The incremental acceleration from the bonus election on 5-year property in 2026 is effectively zero — you were getting 20% anyway. The actual benefit lives in the 15-year land improvements, where MACRS Year 1 under 150% declining balance is approximately 5%, and the bonus election gets you to 20%. That 15-percentage-point delta on the 15-year bucket — that's where the math actually matters.

ALEX: That is a correct and important distinction, and it materially changes the calculation. On $960,000 of 15-year improvements, the incremental bonus acceleration is $144,000 in additional Year 1 deductions. At 37% federal — call it a combined 45% with state in a high-tax jurisdiction — that is $64,800 in tax dollars moved from future years into Year 1. That is not trivial, and it represents money you never recover after December 31st.

DIANA: I agree $64,800 is meaningful. My point is that most of the bonus depreciation marketing materials I see are quoting total year-one deductions as if they're all incremental to waiting, when the 5-year component gives you the same year-one percentage with or without the bonus election. The effective benefit is roughly half of what operators are being told it is. Know the actual number before you make an acquisition decision based on the tax.

ALEX: Fair. And here is the counter-argument to your caution: the look-back opportunity. This is what I think is actually the bigger story for existing portfolio holders, not acquisition timing. If you acquired a property in 2021, 2022, or 2023 and never commissioned a cost seg study, you can file a Form 3115 — change of accounting method — and take the entire catch-up §481(a) adjustment in the current tax year. No amended returns required. Under Rev. Proc. 2015-13, you get the aggregate catch-up deduction in a single year.

DIANA: With one critical caveat that most practitioners miss: the bonus rate that applies to the §481(a) catch-up is the rate in effect when the property was originally placed in service, not the rate in effect when you're filing the 3115 today. Property placed in service in 2021 — 100% bonus. 2022 — 80%. 2023 — 60%. 2024 — 40%. You are getting the historical rate, not today's 20%. This is actually a massive opportunity for 2020 and 2021 acquisitions sitting unexamined in people's portfolios right now.

ALEX: Which is my entire point. If you own a commercial building acquired in 2020 or 2021 — $10 million, $20 million, any size — and you have never done a cost seg study, you are potentially sitting on a six or seven figure deduction you can take this year using a 100% or 80% bonus rate that you will never again have access to after you file this return without the 3115. That is the emergency. Not the acquisition timing — the look-back on what you already own.

DIANA: I'll give you that fully. The look-back via §481(a) change of accounting method is one of the most underutilized provisions in commercial real estate tax planning. The window is not technically closing — you can always do a look-back — but the bonus rates available for 2020 and 2021 properties are, in practice, only accessible if you commission the study and file the 3115 before your returns are finalized for the year you want to capture the deduction in. The sooner, the better, given that the 2021 bonus rate of 100% will never be available again under current law.

ALEX: Final verdict on the 2026 bonus depreciation question: the acquisition timing urgency is real but narrower than marketed — it lives in the 15-year bucket, not the 5-year. The look-back on existing assets is the larger, more universal opportunity. And Congress extending bonus depreciation is plausible but not guaranteed. Act as if they won't. Do the study, close the deal if it underwrites correctly, and get the 3115 filed. That's the verdict.

DIANA: My verdict: don't buy bad deals to capture a tax benefit. Do get cost seg studies on everything you already own that has never been analyzed, especially 2019 through 2022 acquisitions. The look-back opportunity is real, the rates are favorable, and the window to act on the historical rates — while technically open — is practically narrowing with every filing deadline. That's the actionable item for listeners today.

Alex Mercer is a principal at Mercer Capital Advisors. Diana Cross, CPA, JD, is a tax attorney at Cross & Harrington. Neither statement constitutes tax advice.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this platform is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, financial, legal, or investment advice. Cost segregation studies and depreciation benefits vary based on property type, ownership structure, and applicable federal and state tax law. Results are estimates only. You should consult a qualified tax professional, CPA, or attorney before making any tax-related decisions. ClickDrag Finance does not guarantee specific tax outcomes.